Canada And NATO
In November 2010, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization met at Lisbon to agree a new Strategic Concept, the first revision since 1999.[1] It was also the first Summit where NATO Allies met in the Organization's probably final form, fully enlarged. Although it might be an unreliable indicator, all the flag poles at the entrance of the NATO Defense College in Rome are filled, and there are no additional spaces for new flags, and just recently, the ground has been broken in Brussels for the construction of the new Alliance headquarters. These observations suggest that enlargement has been completed.
As many experts (and nay-sayers) predicted, enlargement to regions not directly or ...
Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers
|
change over the last 15 years, when the possibility of enlargement (and its implications) were first put on the table through the "Study on Enlargement." In particular, the Alliance has sought to move from a common defence to collective security posture, a difference which is, admittedly only academic, as collective security may mean common defence to some Allies. As always, reconciling the strategic needs of each member has proven difficult.
Enlargement means a larger geographic area to secure, and also a larger administration to carry out the work, which means more costs to each members, in a context of re-allocation of administrative postings for each member. Since the arrival of the new Secretary General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Organization has been in the throes of re-structuring itself for greater efficiency.
Although Canada supports the general direction depicted above, the parallel processes of enlargement and of administrative and strategic renewal of the ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
are clearly much more important to some NATO Allies than others. This author has heard it said that cyber-attacks should be responded to in kind, and feature as worthy of an Article 5 response. This is clearly unworkable because in Canadian parlance, cyber security (which is called cyber-alertness) is part of critical infrastructure, which is not the remit of defence or diplomacy. Canada's perception is that cyber security policy should address predominantly the security of Alliance communications (that is, for example, cyber defence against threats to NATO HQ communications, or operational communications in the field between Allies and Partners). The limitations imposed by this ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Canada And NATO. (2011, May 23). Retrieved November 28, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Canada-And-NATO/99348
"Canada And NATO." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 23 May. 2011. Web. 28 Nov. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Canada-And-NATO/99348>
"Canada And NATO." Essayworld.com. May 23, 2011. Accessed November 28, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Canada-And-NATO/99348.
"Canada And NATO." Essayworld.com. May 23, 2011. Accessed November 28, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Canada-And-NATO/99348.
|
Save
Report