Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
Federal Govt. Vs. States - College Term Papers

Federal Govt. Vs. States


Federal Sovereignty vs. Rights of the States Continued�. Federal Sovereignty versus States Rights was not a new problem to the United States. First appearing during the writing of the Constitution and continuing through Hamilton�s Bank and the Federalist Papers, this debate raged right into the 19th century, beginning with the Hartford Convention, where delegates proposed that a state had the right to �interpose authority� in a case of �dangerous and palpable infractions.� However, this was only the first in a series of arguments that would in the end, result in civil war. The next major step was the handling of cases for businesses. During the 1810�s and 20�s Chief Justice John Marshall ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

that the bank was constitutional and that the federal law was supreme over the states, who had no right to tax it. In doing this, he sharply defined the rights of the states as subordinate to those of the nation�s. However, Marshall�s rulings did not last long. During the term of Andrew Jackson, the Bank was destroyed by the president. Staring with vetoing the renewal of the Bank�s charter, he set out to eliminate what he though was a corrupt monopoly. By demolishing the Bank, he allowed smaller state banks to assume more power. Finally, during the early 1830�s, nullification came into question. In this situation, South Carolina had declared a government law, (tariff bill) void because a convention found it to be unconstitutional. While John Calhoun argued that the Constitution was based on false assumptions and that a minority of the nation could reassume its independence. However, Jackson saw the truth. He knew that if a state could ignore the laws then the Union would cease ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.


Already a member? Login


CITE THIS PAGE:

Federal Govt. Vs. States. (2005, February 9). Retrieved November 28, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Federal-Govt-Vs-States/21960
"Federal Govt. Vs. States." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 9 Feb. 2005. Web. 28 Nov. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Federal-Govt-Vs-States/21960>
"Federal Govt. Vs. States." Essayworld.com. February 9, 2005. Accessed November 28, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Federal-Govt-Vs-States/21960.
"Federal Govt. Vs. States." Essayworld.com. February 9, 2005. Accessed November 28, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Federal-Govt-Vs-States/21960.
JOIN NOW
Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays


PAPER DETAILS
Added: 2/9/2005 02:35:54 AM
Category: World History
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 473
Pages: 2

Save | Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS
Save and find your favorite essays easier

SIMILAR ESSAYS
Big vs Small Govt
Copyright | Cancel | Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Essayworld. All rights reserved