United States of America V. Deppe

Want to read the rest of this paper? Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay and over 50,000 other term papers

Whether or not fairly attributed to Barnum appears to be as insightful in cyber-commerce in face-to-face business transactions.

* The District Court concluded "The defendant did not truthfully admit the conduct of the offensive conviction and did not truthfully admit and has falsely denied other relevant conduct"

* Appellant's failure to accept full responsibility.

* Logical explanation for the 7-7 month's sentence.

6. Conclusion: The U.S. court of Appeals held that defendant Deppe did not deserve a sentence reduction. The court of Appeals upheld the District courts sentencing of Deppe to seventy- eight months in prison.

7. Our View: My opinion towards the case is why the U.S. court of Appeals denied Deppe reduction towards his own time? I hope the courts charged his other business partner that participated in the Super Bowl tickets too. I liked how Deppe man up to his own consequences and how he wants to take full charge for it, so I think the courts should ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays. Write better papers. Get better grades. Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE: