Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
Foster v Chatmen - College Term Papers

Foster v Chatmen

Foster v. Chatmen

Judicial History

The petitioner was Timothy Tyrone Foster and the respondent Bruce Chatman, Warden. The location for the case was at the Supreme Court of Floyd County in Georgia. Docket no. 14-8349. It was argued on November 2, 2015, and decided on May 23, 2016 (Oyez).

Facts

Foster was charged with killing an old woman named Queen Madge White in 1986. During the trial, the prosecution excluded four qualified black jurors. Based on the Batson v. Kentucky case, the defense objected to the exclusion, which prompted the prosecution to explain and provide sufficient proof for their elimination (Oyez). The prosecution presented its reasons, which were accepted as ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

of Foster’s trial.

Rule

The court ruled that there was enough evidence to show that there was deliberate discrimination in the jury selection of Foster’s trial, which is prohibited in Supreme Court’s Batson v. Kentucky.

Application

The court stated that the defendant met the third step of a Batson challenge, which requires the presentation of evidence that the exclusion of jurors was deliberate and based on discrimination, which the state court erred in dismissing.

The Court further explained that the evidence presented indicated that the prosecution was not willing to let the excluded jurors serve, and the main reasons for excluding them were most likely pretextual (Oyez). The reasons provided for striking out the jurors were not sufficient, and the retrieved prosecution notes supported Foster’s argument that he suffered discrimination.

Conclusion

The Court concluded that two peremptory strikes based on race are against what the constitution ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE:

APA
MLA
Chicago
Turabian

Foster v Chatmen. (2018, November 6). Retrieved November 28, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Foster-v-Chatmen/106881

"Foster v Chatmen." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 6 Nov. 2018. Web. 28 Nov. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Foster-v-Chatmen/106881>

"Foster v Chatmen." Essayworld.com. November 6, 2018. Accessed November 28, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Foster-v-Chatmen/106881.

JOIN NOW

Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

PAPER DETAILS

Added: 11/6/2018 01:03:47 AM
Submitted By: Arinushka
Category: Legal Issues
Type: Free Paper
Words: 339
Pages: 2

Save |

Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS

Save and find your favorite essays easier